Skip to main content

Responsibilities and Scope (RACI)

This section defines the roles and responsibilities of key governance participants within the House of Stake, using the RACI matrix:

  • R – Responsible: Who does the work
  • A – Accountable: Who is ultimately answerable for the outcome
  • C – Consulted: Who provides input or expertise
  • I – Informed: Who must be kept up to date

Governance Roles​

Governance ProcessScreening CommitteeEndorsed DelegatesDelegatesSecurity CouncilveNEAR HoldersNEAR HoS Foundation
Pre-screening and approval of proposalsR, AIIIII
Voting on SC approved proposalsIR, AR, AIR, AI
Security Council 72 h reviewCIIR, AIC
Execution of approved proposalsIIICIR, A
Rejected proposal appeal process (interim requires a screening committee vote with presented evidence)R, ACCIRA
Selecting & removing Endorsed DelegatesR, AIIIIC
Emergency intervention / critical patchCIIR, AIC
Veto of PASSED proposals that are illegal or infeasible (should have been caught before this point. Redundant safeguard)IIIR, AIC
Treasury execution & fund disbursement (at behest of DAO)IIIIIR, A
Conflict-of-interest & disclosure reportingR, AR, AR, AR, AIC / Oversight
Transparency & publication of decisionsR, AR, AR, AR, ACA (archive)
Constitutional / policy amendmentsCCCCR, AA
Transition to community governance (post-2026)CCCCAR

Note: This table serves as a starting point. Roles and scopes may evolve as the governance system matures.


Why RACI Matters​

The RACI model clarifies responsibilities, reduces overlap, and increases transparency. It makes complex governance processes easier to understand and more efficientβ€”especially in decentralized environments.


Aligned with:​

Last updated October 2025